Once racial and socioeconomic disparities are recognized, it is difficult to determine how to address these issues. We seem to be most comfortable with taking a color blind approach and avoiding reverse favoritism, but this seems to do nothing to help the issues. With the recent overwhelming vote in favor of proposal 2 on the last Michigan ballot, we can see that people clearly want to pretend that equal is fair. Color blind and money blind policies that focus on giving everyone the same opportunities based on level of qualification might work in a perfect world, but unfortunately, we live on Earth. I hope that some day Affirmative action will not be necessary. I hope that someday we can honestly say that equally qualified African Americans and individuals with second hand clothes are just as likely to be hired in comparison to their white affluent counter parts. Today, I simply do not think this is true. Until our prejudices are bred out and forgotten, until widespread residential segregation in
Michigan is no longer a factor, until children of all colors and socioeconomic statuses start out with equal access to resources and equal amounts of support, we cannot expect them to compete in an “equal opportunity market.” It ends up not being equal at all.
So how do we address these issues without calling attention to the child who is wearing a threadbare coat? How do we provide support without prejudging young men based on the color of their skin? Very carefully, I suppose, but I believe that the risks are of far milder consequence than the benefits.
As detailed in the NYT article, “To Close Gaps, Schools Focus on Black Boys,” Ossining Union Free School District is implementing
a special mentoring program that pairs [young black males] with black teachers for one-on-one guidance outside class, extra homework help, and cultural activities during the school day. “All the black boys used to end up in the office, so we had to do something,” said Lorraine Richardson, a second-grade teacher and mentor. “We wanted to teach them to help each other” instead of fight each other.
While many school districts have long worked to close the achievement gap between minority and white students,
Ossining’s programs aimed to get black male students to college are a new frontier.
Ossining school officials said they were not singling out black boys, but after a district analysis of high school students’ grade-point averages revealed that black boys were performing far worse than any other group, they decided to act. In contrast, these officials said, the performance of black girls compared favorably with other students and did not warrant the same concern.
The district calls the program a “moral imperative,” and I agree with them. It is certain that care needs to be taken so that negative messages about skin color are not communicated to students, but all of the examples of special support which the young boys receive seemed very positive rather than punitive or stigmatized.
Under the programs, the extra attention begins in elementary school; every black boy in fourth and fifth grades, for example, is assigned a team of teachers to track his academic progress.
The boys also meet black role models, while their parents attend workshops on planning for college. Motivation is emphasized throughout. As part of a recent dress for success contest, high school boys wore suits to school for a month. The two winners received hand-tailored suits.
I think this is an extremely good thing. The program is giving boys the chance to interact with strong role models who share the same color of skin. This is an important step to take if negative stereotypes of African American Males are going to be reversed. Encouraging professionalism and helping parents plan for their child’s college education is also an amazing and needed resource for these students.
While this seems like an all good thing, it is understandable for some individuals to think that things could take a wrong turn.
Some of the nation’s leading minority scholars have praised
Ossining’s approach, but other educators, parents and civil rights groups contend that such separate programs do more harm than good. Last year, the New York Civil Rights Coalition filed a complaint with the United States Department of Education over such a program at the City University of New York, and the group plans to file a complaint with the state against
Ossining’s program.
“I think this is a form of racial profiling in the public school system,” said the coalition’s executive director, Michael Meyers. “What they’re doing here, under the guise of helping more boys, is they’re singling them out and making them feel inferior or different simply because of their race and gender.”
While I understand the concern, I firmly believe that there are too many aspects of our culture that already tell young black boys that they are inferior. Many influences also tell these young men that doing well in school is lame or “acting white.” These are lies can only be reversed when we call the problem by its name, and then work to reverse it. Of course it is bad to single out a certain group for their race, but it is not wrong to give young people positive role models who are similar to the young person, or to help motivate the young person with programs with which they can relate. White children enjoy this privilege every day as they turn on their tv sets and open their classic literature books to view and read about white heroes in a white society attaining white money and white success. The disparity exists, and we can not afford to ignore it.
In Maryland, a state education task force asserted in December that “school, itself, is an at-risk environment for African-American male youth” and issued a 58-page report “to justify fixing it — whatever the cost.”
This program addresses the issue at hand, and it seems to be working so far.
The school officials here noted that it is too soon to measure the impact of their programs with test scores, but that the percentage of black students enrolled in college-level courses in 11th and 12th grades has more than doubled to 55 percent this year from 26 percent in 2004.
In the lower grades, teachers have also reported that disciplinary referrals for black boys have dropped — as much as 80 percent at Brookside — and that the boys are missing fewer homework assignments and paying more attention in class. (Efforts are under way now to begin similar programs for Hispanic boys, who have also not performed well.)
While singling out populations of students in order to assist them will always be a sensitive issue, I would rather have schools give assistance where assistance is due. Dancing around the issue, and convincing ourselves that the world is already being fair to these young people will do nothing to break down the barriers to the success of minority populations.
To Close Gaps, Schools Focus on Black Boys
By Winnie Hu
April 9, 2007
New York Times
Here is that link to the Secondlife stuff… http://www.secondlife.com
when ur on ur computer at home, just click on Join in the upper right hand corner.
-Adam
Wow, interesting article. While I do not agree with everything in it, it does raise some very important points. I agree with you that judging a person based upon race, color, gender, etc… is wrong, I do not agree with you that affirmative action is the way to go. As long as individuals are given benefits over other individuals solely based on color, gender, or minority status, it will never go away.
The reality of the situation is that this will never go away. No matter how hard people try, no matter how many laws are made, no matter how many government programs are created, there will always be those that have less. There will always be those that are discriminated against. There will always be those that are marginalized and looked down upon. The reality is that we live in a world full of sin. These issues cannot be solved by programs because at root they take place in each individual, it is human nature.
Just because it will never go away does not mean that we should tolerate it though. Those who do discriminate or marginalize should be punished for it, and at the very least when seen or heard each individual should make sure that it is stopped.
Thanks for entering the discussion about equality in schools Jon,
I think you are right to point out that addressing an issue head on, when dealing with inequality is always a tricky issue. We certainly never want to separate students based on skin or social class in the guise that we are helping them. This would be unconstitutional because it would go against the Supreme Court’s decision that “seperate but equal” would not be tolerated. Seperate but equal is not the kind of program we are talking about here. Students of all races should learn together and get the same resources and instruction as the next kid. It is also great for them to interact with each other in order to break down social stigmas and boundaries. What we are talking about here, is some simple retribution for the disparities which already exsist. As I stated before, there is no deficite of white, rich, successful role models in our literature and in our television programing. Advantaged populations don’t need us to go the extra mile for them. In addition to reading minority texts acroos all student populations, I find it inspirational to give minority students minority role models that they can look up to. It is not fair for students to grow up being told that “white is right” by the selection of role models that have to chose from. Some of the optional cultural activities are also a great way for minorities to feel that their culture is important and valuable. This is all so vital to a young persons development of a sense of self, sense of motivation, and sense of pride in their own heritage and their own accomplishments.
I’m conserned that you seem to be saying two conflicting things in your comment.
You say that giving benefits to minorities will cause the problem to never go away:
“As long as individuals are given benefits over other individuals solely based on color, gender, or minority status, it will never go away.”
Then you say that no matter what we do the problem will not go away.
“The reality of the situation is that this will never go away. No matter how hard people try, no matter how many laws are made, no matter how many government programs are created, there will always be those that have less. There will always be those that are discriminated against. There will always be those that are marginalized and looked down upon. The reality is that we live in a world full of sin. These issues cannot be solved by programs because at root they take place in each individual, it is human nature.”
I feel like this is a negative and pre-defeated attitude to have in such an important matter.
You do say that we should still work to solve the problem:
“Just because it will never go away does not mean that we should tolerate it though. Those who do discriminate or marginalize should be punished for it, and at the very least when seen or heard each individual should make sure that it is stopped.”
but I don’t know if we can assume that marginalization and discrimination are powers that exist on a case by case basis.
Thanks for engaging me in this discussion about equality in our education systems. If you have any more suggestions about adressing this problem, I’d love to hear more of your thoughts.
Thanks, Bethany
[...] Commented: Finding Solutions [...]
[...] Comment Two [...]